AI Cite Who1. AI Cite Who vs Profound vs Peec AI: the quick decision
For a founder or small website team that wants to know where its brand is missing from AI recommendations and what to work on next, we recommend AI Cite Who first. Start with a public website analysis, choose the buying questions that matter to your business, then pay for a defined answer audit. The result connects observed recommendations and sources with work on your own pages and eligible third-party sources.
This comparison is written by the team behind AI Cite Who. We checked current official product pages on October 9, 2026; we have not tested all three products in identical paid accounts. Our recommendation is for a particular job and budget. A team running daily brand analytics or deploying marketing agents has a different purchase to make.
| Decision | AI Cite Who | Profound | Peec AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our suggested fit | A website owner moving from selected buyer questions to a practical action report | A team evaluating a broader marketing-agent program | A marketing team maintaining ongoing AI visibility analytics |
| Paid entry | Plus $49.90/month; Pro $99.90/month, excluding tax | Custom Enterprise brand quote; free Trial available 1 | Confirm the current price; no numeric amount loaded in our check 2 |
| Question scope | Plus saves 50 questions per project and checks up to 10 per audit; Pro saves 100 and checks up to 20 | Trial uses a preset question set; Enterprise permits custom questions 1 | Starter tracks 50 prompts on three chosen models 2 |
| Cadence | Selected paid audits; Pro also supports scheduled analysis | Daily prompt tracking 6 | Daily tracking 2 |
| From finding to work | One evidence-based report of website and third-party actions; your team carries them out | Aim can hand project tasks to marketing Agents 5 | Actions provides evidence, briefs and steps for opportunities 4 |
| Before you buy | Review the website baseline and the exact audit quote | Request the brand package that includes the capabilities you need | Confirm the price, selected models and applicable feature tier |
2. Start with the buyer question you need to answer
A small team rarely needs to measure every topic in its market on the first day. It may need to answer one question: does AI recommend our support tool when a buyer asks for shared email handling for a five-person SaaS team? That question is more useful for the next page edit than a broad request for the best business software. Start with requirements that customers actually raise in sales calls, support conversations or onboarding.
AI Cite Who can suggest questions from the analyzed website, and you can add or import your own. Review the wording before choosing a paid audit scope. Suggestions are starting points, not measured prompt volume or a feed of private AI conversations. Use your customer evidence to choose which questions deserve your budget.
Keep discovery, comparison and validation questions separate in your working list. One asks which products exist, another compares a shortlist, and another checks a requirement such as an integration or plan limit. The wording determines what you are measuring. A brand can appear in a broad answer and still be absent when a buyer adds the constraint your product is supposed to solve.
- Discovery: Which shared inbox tools suit a five-person SaaS support team?
- Comparison: Which support tools offer shared email handling and transparent small-team pricing?
- Validation: Which shared inbox tools support the integration our team requires?
3. Compare evidence before comparing visibility scores
Ask three separate questions when reviewing an answer: was your brand mentioned, was it recommended for the requirement, and was your website cited? Those outcomes are related, but one does not establish the others. An answer can cite your guide while recommending another product. A brand name can appear in a warning or a comparison without being a suggested option.
AI Cite Who preserves the selected questions and observed outcomes for the audit, distinguishes answer citations from search-returned candidates, and keeps the original provider responses privately for verification. The customer report presents structured findings and sources rather than promising a full transcript export. This makes the practical review specific: open the cited page, inspect what it actually says, and decide whether the proposed task follows from the evidence.
Our audits use selected available ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity API search configurations. Peec documents browser-based collection through consumer interfaces, while Profound documents capturing front-end results.36 These are different observation conditions. API checks do not reproduce personalized consumer-app answers, and no single browser sample represents every user. Choose the measurement surface your decision needs, and compare changes within the same method.
4. AI Cite Who pricing: budget a question set you can repeat
AI Cite Who Plus is $49.90/month or $499/year, with 300 shared monthly credits and two website projects. Pro is $99.90/month or $999/year, with 900 credits and five projects. Paid prices are in USD and exclude tax. Annual payment reduces the equivalent monthly subscription cost, but it is an upfront yearly purchase; monthly credits are not a single annual pool.
The current normal-audit formula is 10 + 2 × selected questions + selected questions × (selected platforms − 1) credits. The example below assumes ten questions, three available platforms and no other spending from the shared balance. It is a budget calculation, not a fixed audit entitlement or a daily-monitoring package. The application shows the applicable quote before you confirm a new run.
Every plan includes one website analysis per project every seven days. Additional website analyses and question generation use credits on paid plans. Each repeated check is a normal audit at its applicable quote. Keep room for other operations when planning a month of work.
| Budget item | Calculation | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| One ten-question, three-platform audit | 10 + 20 + 20 = 50 credits | A complete selected-question audit and its report |
| Four audits at that same scope | 4 × 50 = 200 credits | Multiple dated observations of the same questions |
| Remaining Plus balance in this example | 300 − 200 = 100 credits | Available only if no other credit-consuming operations have run |
| Equivalent monthly annual-plan price | Plus $499 ÷ 12 ≈ $41.58; Pro $999 ÷ 12 = $83.25 | Annual billing equivalents, not month-to-month checkout prices |
5. Profound and Peec AI pricing: compare the actual offer
Profound’s checked brand offer is a free seven-day Trial with 50 preset prompts, followed by custom Enterprise pricing. Trial questions cannot be customized; Enterprise supports customization.1 Ask for the package that tests your own requirements before treating a trial as a like-for-like evaluation. This describes brand purchasing, not every agency offer.
Peec’s Starter lists one project and unlimited users, and its page offers additional-model purchases. Numeric plan and add-on prices did not load in our browser check.2 Confirm current monthly and annual totals directly. We do not substitute an old third-party amount or interpret a failed price display as a missing paid plan.
The useful comparison is the total offer for your intended work: the questions you will use, the platforms you need, how often checks run, who needs access, and which action or reporting features are included. A low starting price can be good value for a narrow job. A larger package can be good value when a team regularly uses the additional capacity. Neither follows from the headline price alone.
- Request the payable amount and currency, and separate monthly payment from annual billing equivalents.
- Confirm whether the quoted scope includes your chosen models and custom questions.
- Ask about extra usage, renewal terms, data access and the features you will actually use.
6. From recommendation gaps to specific website work
A useful action report should let the website maintainer identify the target page, the missing or conflicting fact, the supporting observation and a completion check. “Improve your authority” is too broad to assign. “Clarify whether the required integration is included on the relevant plan” can become real work if checked pages support that omission.
AI Cite Who brings the website evidence and selected-question findings into one shared action plan. It can suggest first-party page work and eligible third-party work, while keeping competitor-owned destinations out of placement targets. Your team verifies the facts and carries out the changes. The product does not automatically publish content, secure a listing or arrange outreach.
Peec also documents evidence-backed Actions, content briefs and step lists; Profound’s Aim connects projects to Agents.45 We do not claim that action guidance is unique to AI Cite Who. Our fit judgment is that a website baseline, a bounded audit and a report your maintainer can use make a practical starting workflow for a small team. If execution automation is a purchase requirement, evaluate it directly rather than assuming a diagnostic report includes it.
7. A small SaaS team’s workflow: one question, one justified task
Consider a fictional shared-inbox vendor. This is an illustrative scenario, not a customer result. The owner selects the first question above and runs an audit. In one observed answer, the fictional brand is not recommended, a comparable product is named, and a third-party comparison page is cited. That establishes an observation for this question and configuration. It does not reveal the model’s private reason for excluding the brand.
The owner opens the cited page and reviews the checked website evidence. Suppose the vendor’s pricing page states the team-size limit but leaves the requested integration unclear. A justified first task is to verify the real integration entitlement and state it on the relevant pricing or product page. If that fact is already clear, the task should not be proposed merely because the brand was absent from an answer.
A separate source task may be appropriate if an observed independent directory contains an outdated product fact and accepts owner corrections. Follow its rules and identify the relationship to the product. If the source belongs to a competitor, prepare verifiable proof on your own site instead of seeking a placement there. A citation is a reason to inspect a source, not permission to post anywhere.
- Save the question wording and the dated outcome you are investigating.
- Verify the source claim and the current fact on your own checked page.
- Assign the exact edit and define how the maintainer will confirm it is complete.
- Record the edit date and run a new comparable audit when you need another observation.
- Treat a changed answer as a new observation; it does not prove the edit caused the change.
8. When daily monitoring or a broader marketing platform is worth it
Daily monitoring can be useful when someone owns a regular review process, tracks campaigns or market changes, and has enough questions to justify a continuing analytics workflow. Before buying, decide who will review the changes and what decisions they will make. Daily data has less practical value when the team has no capacity to inspect findings or act on them.
For that ongoing analytics job, Peec is a candidate to evaluate. For a broader marketing operation, assess Profound’s project and Agent workflow. These recommendations are based on the documented scope, not a claim that either product is necessary for every business. Ask to see the exact workflow on a question and task from your own company.
Choose AI Cite Who when your next milestone is a focused diagnosis and a manageable set of website and third-party changes. Pro adds scheduled analysis and report exports in HTML or Markdown, but its shared credits still determine the affordable scope. It does not provide an unlimited daily tracking feed or the enterprise governance and marketing automation of a larger platform.
9. Final choice: AI Cite Who for an owner who needs a clear next step
Our first recommendation is AI Cite Who for a small team that controls its website, has concrete buyer questions and wants evidence-backed work it can finish. The subscription and audit quote are explicit, the website baseline provides a starting point before a paid answer audit, and the report keeps the next task connected to observed evidence.
Consider Peec when your main requirement is an ongoing team analytics process, and consider Profound when you are purchasing a broader marketing-agent program. Do not pay for a larger workflow solely because it has more features. Equally, do not choose a focused audit product if the required consumer-interface monitoring, enterprise controls or execution tools are absent.
Start with the free website analysis in AI Cite Who. Review the findings, prepare your buyer questions and confirm the paid audit scope when you are ready. Use the user guide, real anonymized case and pricing page linked below to inspect the process before subscribing. No tool can guarantee that a content change will make an AI platform recommend or cite your brand.
10. Frequently asked questions
Is AI Cite Who free? The included public website analysis is free within its limits. AI buyer-answer audits require a paid plan and credits. The free baseline does not test whether ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity recommends your brand.
Is AI Cite Who the cheapest of these three? We can verify our subscription prices and audit scope. We cannot claim a complete cheapest-tool ranking without a current Peec price and a comparable Profound quote. Compare the cost of your required workflow.
Does AI Cite Who write and publish the recommended changes? It produces supported findings and concrete actions. Your team verifies and implements them; report generation is not automatic website editing or third-party publication.
Can I directly compare visibility percentages between the tools? Not without aligning questions, platforms, collection methods, dates and metric definitions. Prefer evidence you can inspect and comparisons within the same measurement method.
Do I need all three products? Start with the tool that solves your immediate job. Add another only when you can name a missing capability, an owner for the workflow and a budget for using it.