AI Cite Who1. AI Cite Who: choose the questions, inspect the gap, assign the work
For a website owner, a useful audit ends with a decision about the site. Which buying situation left the brand out? Which cited page can you inspect? Is there a supported change your team can make? AI Cite Who is our first recommendation when those questions explain why you are looking for an OtterlyAI alternative. It combines public website analysis, paid selected-question checks and a shared action report.
The free baseline checks public evidence before you spend on recommendation sampling. Paid audits then distinguish recommendations, mentions and final citations across selected, available ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity API search answers. The report connects supported website and external tasks to observed evidence, target pages and completion checks. You can judge whether a task is useful without treating a moving visibility number as a mandate to rewrite the site.
2. Be clear about why you would change a $29 workflow
OtterlyAI’s checked pricing lists Lite at $29 month-to-month for 15 prompts tracked daily.1 AI Cite Who Plus costs $49.90 per month, so we do not describe it as the cheaper entry subscription. The reason to choose it is the fit of its website-analysis and audit workflow. A higher subscription must be justified by work your team values and will actually use.
If all you need is to keep a daily record of a few questions on included platforms, investigate that existing option carefully. If the unresolved job is deciding what to fix and handing it to a website maintainer, evaluate AI Cite Who on the completeness of one evidence-backed task. Does it identify an observed issue, the relevant page, the facts to verify and what counts as done? That is a concrete purchase criterion.
3. Include the platforms you need in the cost comparison
The checked OtterlyAI Lite offer includes ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot; other engines are listed separately as add-ons.1 An entry price therefore may not cover the exact platform set your team wants. Compare the checkout configuration you would actually buy. Avoid treating a Google search surface and a standalone assistant as identical just because both display an AI answer.
AI Cite Who quotes a selected audit scope using questions and platforms. A standard audit costs 10 + 2Q + Q(P − 1) credits: ten questions on three selected platforms cost 50. Plus includes 300 monthly credits and Pro 900, at $49.90 and $99.90 per month respectively, excluding tax. Other credit-consuming work draws from the same balance. This is a scoped audit calculation, not an unlimited or automatically daily service.
4. A source chart should lead to a page you can check
OtterlyAI documents Domain Sources filters and categories for inspecting where citations appear.2 That can be useful for finding a pattern. The next step for a website owner is to open a relevant page and see whether it supports the buying requirement. A domain appearing often does not establish that its content caused an answer to recommend a brand, and a domain-level count does not explain which claim needs attention.
AI Cite Who keeps final-answer citations separate from retrieved candidates and ties proposed work to evidence. Consider a hypothetical vendor whose public pricing page never explains a minimum contract term. If website evidence confirms the omission, clarifying the verified term can be a useful task. If the fact is not verified, the task must ask for confirmation first. An answer that leaves the brand out does not, by itself, justify inventing a pricing problem.
5. Set the checking cadence around real website work
Daily tracking and an audit after a substantive change answer different operational questions. Daily records help a team watch a series; a scoped audit lets an owner examine a selected question set and its supported tasks. Choose the cadence before choosing a package. A small team that changes pages weekly may need a focused review more than another daily alert, although repeated observations can still help identify variation.
Pro supports schedules and HTML or Markdown downloads of AI Cite Who’s structured findings and tasks. Full provider responses remain internal and are not included in those exports. Keep the same core question wording, language and comparable platform conditions for later checks. Changes between two runs can reflect sampling or search changes, so do not present a new recommendation as proven credit for a page edit.
- Before a change: save the relevant audit and supported task.
- After a change: record the actual page work and its completion checks.
- At the next audit: inspect evidence before explaining score movement.
6. Test the working outcome before replacing the subscription
You do not need to cancel an existing tool to evaluate the free website baseline. Preserve your question wording and the records you are entitled to retain, then review a small paid audit scope when needed. We do not claim automatic migration of OtterlyAI history. Look for a report that helps you complete one worthwhile website task before expanding the question set or changing the rest of your reporting process.
Peec AI is another candidate for teams primarily comparing daily prompt analytics and collaboration.3 Our first recommendation for the owner who needs a free baseline, selected-question evidence and practical website actions is AI Cite Who. Start at the website analysis, then add recommendation checks when you know which buying questions deserve the spend. No tool can guarantee the next answer, but you can judge the usefulness of the work today.